🔗 Share this article US Male Grand Slam Dry Spell Is Not Taylor Fritz's Burden to Carry I possess a few opinions about that comments delivered by the sports network commentator Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at the majors: none of them has won a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition. Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also split the last seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He said in press after the loss that he actually preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is more than justified to aspire to the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of US winners on the brain? Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success The American, 28, is placed fourth in the world starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six matches over No 3 Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of ranking points away. His top-class delivery and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of rivals on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, Fritz is often helpless. The past few seasons has witnessed the interesting rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless move around with the alarming quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot against him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his potential. The American has achieved a several dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the top 30. 24 months later, he was approaching the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is just too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge too little. Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer. The American's play in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for moments towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to break. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a skirmish peripheral to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive effort to win it. Facing match points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries. The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he could. The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just express how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that load.) ATP Finals: Singles Groups American legend Group The Spanish phenom Taylor Fritz (US) Alex de Minaur (Aus) The Italian stylist Bjorn Borg Division Jannik Sinner (It) Alexander Zverev (Ger) Ben Shelton (US) The Canadian talent “I would likely think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz told an interviewer in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {